Mothers

WITH ATTITUDE

amazon.com


Boiling Point.
Heated dispatches from the parenting front lines.

Home
WEBLOGS AND COLUMNS
• Parenting Isn't Pretty
• Boiling Point
• Thinking It Over
• Therapeutic Laughter
• Contributor's Corner
HOT LINKS
• General health and development
• ADD/ADHD
• Adoption
• Attachment
• Autism
• Education
• FAS/FAE
• Learning Disabilities
• Mental Health
• Other Special Needs
• Sensory Integration
• Therapies
RECOMMENDED READING
• Adoption
• Autism
• FAS/FAE
• Other Special Needs
• Parenting
AT YOUR SERVICE
• MWA Store
• Handy Headlines
• Daily Dispatch
• Adoption Watch
• Fun and Games
• About MWA
• Contact Us

JANUARY 17, 2000

The book on parenting
Do I look like a Complete Idiot?

by Terri Mauro

While perusing the parenting aisles at the super-monster-mega-bookstore recently, I noticed a disturbing trend: the proliferation of parenting books that assume we're completely clueless. Now, I often feel completely clueless, and there are definitely times when I feel my husband is completely clueless, but we're a long way from wanting to bring books into the house that prove it. Yet there they sit on the bookstore shelf: "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Motherhood" and "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Fatherhood." You'd have to be a complete idiot to let your kids see you buying these, but I guess that's the point, isn't it?

Some of the titles make a certain amount of sense. "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Parenting a Teenager"--well, by the time your kids are teenagers, they already believe you're a complete idiot, so no harm there. "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Pregnancy and Childbirth"--well, many people probably find themselves in that situation because they've been complete idiots, so giving them their own guidebook is only humane. And "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Baby Names" is certainly a public service, at least if it advises against naming your child after a Disney character, a force of nature or a mixed drink. As for "The Complete Idiot's Guide to a Well-Behaved Child"--hey, if you can get your child to behave, then you're a less complete idiot than I.

But then there's "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Child Safety." What is this, like--"Don't let them play in traffic"? "Keep forks away from electrical outlets"? "Get your drugs with them little caps that don't come off"? One hates to imagine. "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Raising a Smart Kid" seems downright dangerous--can it be good for your kid to be smarter than you, a complete idiot? Combine that with "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Raising Money-Smart Kids" and you'll wind up with a smartass who will bilk you out of your savings. And don't get me started on "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Adoption." Well, do get me started: People, if you are a complete idiot, and you know you are a complete idiot, please do not adopt. You'll make the rest of us look bad.

Now, I do realize that books which playfully suggest they are for people who require a basic knowledge of a subject are all the rage, and that they are not meant to be taken at face value. I've never had a problem with the "for Dummies" series because it seems fairly clear that the buyer is only a dummy in that specific subject. But buying "The Complete Idiot's Guide" to anything would make me feel like, well, a complete idiot.

And then I would need "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Self-Esteem."

+ + +

JANUARY 19, 2000

Driven to distraction
Stunt-driving, parent-style.

by Terri Mauro

Admit it, it's happened to you. You're driving down the highway, trying to tune out the Sesame Street tape you're hearing for the 5,642nd time, thinking about work or groceries or errands or that cute doctor on "ER," when suddenly open warfare breaks out in the backseat. Maybe somebody touched somebody, or took somebody's toy, or looked at somebody in a way that somebody did not wish to be looked at. Personal space has been invaded. Feelings have been violated. All hell has broken loose.

So you do what any good parent would do: You turn around and issue threats. If you're lucky, and do not meet with resistance from the injured parties, your eyes are only off the road for a few seconds. And when you turn back around, you hope that you do not see stalled traffic or the shoulder of the road or perhaps a tree approaching at 55 mph.

Parents have been perfecting this maneuver since the first caveman lifted his club and grunted, "I'll pull this wheel over right now and we'll just sit here until you can behave," and it's one of the top distracting driving behaviors found in a survey conducted by the Response Insurance Corporation of White Plains, New York. Of a thousand drivers questioned, 12 percent admitted to taking their eyes off the road to quiet screaming children. Fifty-six percent did the same to talk to someone in the car, and one wonders how often that someone was under the age of 10.

The survey also delineated various other driving dangers, including makeup applying, contact-lens inserting, laptop using, and nose picking. But this is the stuff of amateurs. Parents have more interesting things to do at high speeds than put on mascara or put in eyedrops. How many of these stupid parent tricks have you performed?

• Removing packaging from a Toys 'R Us purchase while steering through the crowded parking lot with your elbows.

• Stretching backward to force a recalcitrant child to PUT THAT SEATBELT BACK ON NOW!

• Feeding red-hot french fries one by one to a toddler in the backseat who can't be trusted with the bag.

• Grabbing an object of dispute and declaring it yours.

• Steering with one hand and doing the amazing contortionistic backward backseat window-rolling-up maneuver with the other.

• Quieting a full-blown, screaming, crying, threatening fit.

• Throwing a full-blown, screaming, crying, threatening fit.

• Throwing a Sesame Street tape out the window.

And of course, the most amazing, death-defying feat of them all:

• Driving while under the influence of children.

+ + +

JANUARY 21, 2000

Snow job
The schools are closed, and Mom's on duty.

by Terri Mauro

When I was growing up in southern California, I dreamed of what it might be like to live where it snowed. Sledding every day. Armies of snowmen. Snow forts. Snowshoes. Snowball fights. And, on days when the snow blocked the door and cars couldn't make it on the road and the world was all in white, that most wonderful of childhood events--a snow day. You don't miss a lot of days of school for snow in southern California. How magical, I thought, to be given a day to revel in frozen bliss.

Ha! As fate would have it, I did eventually come to live where it snowed, in a place where snow days are not uncommon. But I'm no longer able to enjoy them. I'm a mom now. And I say: As long as the planet still has atmosphere and gravity, I want those kids in school.

It doesn't help that where I've settled, in New Jersey, they'll call a snow day on the rumor of snow. Actual flakes cause a virtual panic. Store shelves are stripped. People refuse to venture outdoors. School buses cannot be expected to navigate streets with even so much as a dusting. Insurance, I hear. Now, isn't that magical?

There was a time in my life when I would have loved to frolic in the snow all day long. This is not it. Yet my kids can't wait to get good and cold and wet. They'll attempt to make snowmen out of the light coating of white that passes for a crippling blizzard hereabouts. On days when snow actually accumulates, they'll delight in playing with the snow shovel--making big mountains in the driveway, packing the snow down on the sidewalk, dumping shovelfuls of icy crystals on each other's heads.

This is the job of children on snowy days. The job of moms is to sit
inside and watch them through the window while sipping hot chocolate
and reading magazines. And yet, perhaps to fill some need from my
own childhood, I find myself out in the snow with them, receiving snowballs to the head, adjusting little gloves and tying little bootlaces
and wiping snotty little noses, screaming for them not to eat the salty
snow in the street, whining to go inside. Oh, to be a kid again. Then,
I might actually enjoy this.

And maybe I'd enjoy a snow day, too. Now, it means calling strangers
on the snow chain at 5 a.m. to break the bad no-school news. It means
an endless succession of putting on dry layers of clothing, taking off wet layers of clothing, putting on dry layers. It means arguing with children who are blue but swear that they are n-n-n-not c-c-c-cold and can't they just play for five more minutes? It means a disruption in routine, and I don't handle that any better than my neurologically impaired children do. I'd rather hike across frozen tundra pulling them on a sled to get them to school than let them stay home.

Because once they're safely in class, I can indulge in my own version of a perfect snow day: sitting inside a warm house and watching the flakes
pile up prettily. Not playing in it, driving in it, walking in it, sliding in
it, shoveling it, brushing it from cars or clothing. Just watching it. Preferably with hot chocolate and a magazine close at hand.

+ + +

JANUARY 24, 2000

Play's the thing
Aren't kids just supposed to know how to have fun?

by Terri Mauro

My daughter doesn't know how to play.

It's a strange dilemma for a nine-year-old. She should be directing her Barbies in elaborate dramas or appropriating the power of her preferred Pokιmons or building worlds out of Legos or lavishing attention on her American Girls. But though she's come to know that she should want these toys, she doesn't have a clue what to do with them.

Maybe it has to do with the fact that she had no toys at all for the first half of her life--there being no Toys 'R Us expeditions from Russian orphanages--and she just never learned the ropes. Maybe it has to do with her language delays; she lacks an understanding of so many ways of the world that it's hard for her to imitate them in play. Maybe it has to do with her personality; she's a kid who likes rules and to be told what to do, and free play is rather terrifying.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that her Mama doesn't know how to play, either.

Oh, I used to know. I remember playing endlessly with Barbies, and I was never at a loss for toys. I also remember constantly demanding that the grown-ups in my household play with me. So when my daughter now seems so directionless, I should be able to get right down on the floor with her and show her how it's done. But somewhere along the line, I've lost my patience with playthings and my interest in imagination. I get down on the floor and I think of the other 10,000 things I could be doing, and any sustained ability to talk doll talk flies away. And I look at my girl, and she's similarly clueless, and we wind up tossing them back in the closet and putting on a video.

My son knows how to play just fine. He can amuse himself for hours.
Though he's happy enough to play alone, he's constantly asking me to join him--demanding, really, gripping my hand and dragging me to his room--but again, my ability to sustain an interest in lining up cars in traffic jams is about as short as a stalled driver's temper, and so I am not much of a player in his games either.

Ideally, the girl with no ideas and the boy with many should play together like two halves of a whole. But the big sister doesn't feel it's appropriate to be led in play by her younger sibling, and frankly, she's not all that interested in traffic jams either. She does have friends over, and they do try to show her how to play with Pokιmon or party with Barbie, but as I watch surreptitiously from behind the door, I can see that look in my daughter's eyes: the one that says, "What exactly are we doing here, and why?" The trappings of play may be there, but the deep desire is not.

So on those long weekend days when she's already watched her daily tape allotment and no friends are available, what does she do? She does worksheets to strengthen her academic skills. Sounds barbaric, but she likes the concrete rules and predictable actions, and I like the fact that it's good for something, and involves me only in the checking of answers.

Maybe we can say we're playing school.

+ + +

JANUARY 26, 2000

Bad habits
My son sucks his fingers. Got a problem with that?

by Terri Mauro

Some people smoke. Some people gamble. Some eat too much or drink too much or shop too much. My son sucks his fingers. This behavior, harmless in a smaller child but socially unacceptable at six, earns him outspoken disapproval from those who feel he should know better. Yet he clings to those digits with the tenacity of a smoker standing outside in the rain to grab a puff or two. He doesn't care about disapproval or tooth damage or hygeine or drool. He needs to suck. And no parental tantrums or teacher edicts or two-bit behavior modification is gonna stop him.

Consequently, you rarely see him without his hand hanging out of his mouth. The two middle digits of his left hand seem to have magical qualities of comfort that the other fingers and even his thumbs cannot match. Oh, sometimes he'll suck on his shirt collar, or his cuffs, or his toys, but they're just placeholders. The fingers are his favorites, and he sucks them with the unbridled pleasure that some people reserve for fine cigars.

And so, of course, if it brings pleasure, it's got to stop. His teacher has put finger-sucking on her list of behaviors that must not be allowed. Also on that list are screaming in class and shouting out meaningless phrases repetitively at the top of his lungs. Now, it seems to me that on a scale of disruptiveness ranging from loud and hysterical noises to, I don't know, sitting comatose in the corner, finger-sucking skews far toward the latter. But the sight of it just drives some people crazy. Everybody knows of a child who was cured of this by tricks or threats or Tabasco, and so they think he should just cut it out already. "Fingers out!" "Fingers out!" is their refrain. This is like telling a smoker "Hey, cigarette out! I mean it! No more!"

If he's in a mellow mood, he might humor you and stop sucking until you stop watching. If he's in a mischievous mood, he'll take them out and put them in immediately, making a game out of your attempts to set him straight. If he's stressed, he will cling to those fingers for dear life, and you'd be surprised how hard it is to pry fingers from the mouth of a 35-pound boy who does not want them removed. It is a mighty struggle.

And one in which I am reluctant to engage. Frankly, this child has such an elaborate collection of issues--fetal alcohol effect, sensory integration disorder, autistic behaviors, developmental delays, and of course, the dreaded extreme stubborness syndrome--that I'm willing to let him have a little comfort. His array of comfort activities used to be much broader; they included banging his head against the floor, rocking in his bed so hard that he burned some hair off, and whipping his head back and forth like a spectator at some sort of turbo tennis game. Finger-sucking would have been my pick of that litter too, and I'm happy that that's the one that stuck.

The naysayers think this is a sign of lazy parenting, and so be it. We had these same arguments a couple of years ago when he still wasn't toilet trained at age five. Late mastery of this skill isn't uncommon in kids with his neurological makeup, yet there was a fair amount of zealotry on the part of some school personnel about making him get with the program. One therapist even suggested I use suppositories to get him to do the deed on demand. I passed on that proposal. I had tried before to force the issue, and found that this child will do things when he's good and ready, and not before. Any attempts to rush developmental milestones ended with me screaming at a calm child who held all the cards. Life is too short.

In the end, when the time was right, he was toilet-trained in a day. Dry during the day, dry at night, no problemo. And the same thing will happen with the finger-sucking. One day, he'll just pop them out and never pop them back in. I trust this will be sometime before his wedding day.

If not, then it's his wife's problem.

+ + +

JANUARY 28, 2000

Alphabet soup
Letters, we get letters.

by Terri Mauro

Anyone whose child has special needs can tell you about "alphabet soup," that string of diagnoses that follows the child around like a toy train made out of blocks. ADD, PDD, PTSD, OCD, FAS, FAE, RAD, SID, LLD--I always expect to see LMNOP in there somewhere, and now I've figured out what it should stand for: Labels of a Meaningless Nature Obscuring the Person.

The letters are good for something, usually getting services or getting medication or getting a grip, but they rarely present a complete picture of a child. Which means, of course, that there's always room for more labels, and we parents, those of us on the front lines, might as well come up with them ourselves. In that spirit, Mothers with Attitude humbly submits a dozen brand-spanking-new syndromes, suitable for use with balky Child Study Teams, disapproving tantrum witnesses, know-it-all in-laws, and clueless pediatricians. Read them, study them, memorize them, and soon you'll be saying: "His MTED is really acting up today. I wish I could stop the behavior, but between the ESS, SD, and OPPB it's impossible for me to get anywhere. I swear, sometimes I think this kid is PBD, but the doctor suspects MRTM."

• CTD (Creative Truth-telling Disorder)

• ESS (Extreme Stubborness Syndrome)

• MRTM (Mom Reads Too Much)

• MTED (Must Touch Everything Disorder)

• NDSG (Not Developing to the Satisfaction of Grownups)

• NSUS (Never Shuts Up Syndrome)

• OPPB (Obsessive Pushing of Parental Buttons)

• PBD (Possessed by the Devil)

• PTD (Please and Thank-You Deficient)

• SD (Selective Deafness)

• TIDD (Teletubbie Induced Developmental Delays)

• TTW (Traumatic Toys 'R Us Withdrawal)

+ + +

copyright © 2000 by Terri Mauro